Satellite Internet

Satellite Internet Forum.

Welcome, Guest.
Welcome to this satellite broadband discussion forum. Wherever you are and whatever your problem we are here to help each other. Connecting to the internet via satellite is not always easy but is critically important to those in remote places or with poor terrestrial infrastructure. Both service providers and customers are encouraged to contribute. If you are showing as 'Guest', please register at the bottom of the forum home page if you wish to contribute or ask question. May 2018: GDPR: Updates to Privacy and Cookies policies: As you may know, a new EU data protection law called GDPR will apply from Friday 25th May 2018. As part of satsig's commitment to protecting the privacy of site visitors and forum members, I have therefore updated the Privacy and Cookie policies. There are now links leading to these policies: Disclaimer, Terms of Use and Privacy, Forum User Agreement, Forum Rules and Cookies at the bottom of the home page and all forum pages. Read the Forum rules.
      Satellite internet forum          
Pages: 1

Antenna gain vs C/N

(Read 3151 times)
Ex Member
Ex Member


Apr 19th, 2011 at 9:08pm  
Hello

I have a question about relationship between antenna gain and C/N level.

example:

antenna 1.2 meter gain 41.1 dB = C/N on spectrum analyzer 14 dB.

when i change this antenna to 1.8 meter with gain 44.6 dB
(same location, LNB, antenna pointing to max signal) so C/N will be better about 3.5 dB ? and i can recive on spectrum analyzer C/N 17.5 dB ?

Best Regards
Robert
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Eric Johnston
Senior Member
***
Offline


Personal text from Profile,
Options, Top line

Posts: 2108
Reply #1 - Apr 19th, 2011 at 11:00pm  
Assuming you are measuring a carrier and not a satellite originated CW beacon.

The downlink C/Ndown will improve by 3.5 dB but the overall C/Ntotal will not improve by that full amount.

The C/Ntotal you measure on the spectrum analyser is the summation of C/Nup + C/N intermodulation (if multicarriers in the transponder) + C/N down.

For example:
C/Nup= 25 dB
C/Nintermodulation = 21 dB
C/Ndown = 15.5 dB.
C/Ntotal = 25dB + 21 dB + 15.5 dB =  14 dB

If you improve the C/N down by 3.5 dB so C/N down = 19 dB the C/N total becomes 16.2 dB, which is only 2.2 dB improvement.

To do the calculation yourself do the following with the input C/N values:
divide by 10, change sign, 10^X. Write down the amount.
Do this for each value and add them all up.
Process the total thus: log, then times 10.
e.g.
25 dB > 0.00316  
21 dB > 0.00794
15.5 dB > 0.02818
total = 0.03928 > 14 dB

25 dB > 0.00316  
21 dB > 0.00794
19 dB > 0.01259
total = 0.02369 > 16.2 dB

Typically a VSAT outlink carrier or TV carrier from a large hub dish to the remote sites will operate with a high uplink C/Nup and the C/Ntotal at the remote sites will be closely associated with the VSAT dish size. The high uplink C/Nup is achieved using a large dish, high power amplifier and a low gain setting on the transponder.

Return links from remote sites are likely to have their C/Ntotal constrained by the small VSAT size and transmit power.  The satellite transponder has to operate at a  high gain step setting. The result is that the C/Ntotal depends mainly on the uplink C/Nup and increasing the hub receive dish size from say 6m to 13m to improve the dowlink C/Ndown makes no significant improvement overall.

Play here: http://www.satsig.net/linkbugt.htm
wxw

Best regards, Eric.

* The above analysis is simplified as it does not mention the uplink and downlink interference entries from cross-pol and adjacent satellites, which might typically be 25 and 25 dB. These figures vary significantly.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 20th, 2011 at 6:09am by Admin1 »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1