|
Apr 3rd, 2008 at 8:19pm
That's pretty interesting. I'm not sure that's what iDirect had in mind when they developed the locking capability.
I suppose it might be interesting to put your ISP to the test by turning the tables and telling them that if they don't unlock the modem that you will take your service elsewhere.
It's better in almost all cases for the NOC to make any configuration changes, and when I look at this forum and see all the people who want to mess around with their configurations, I can understand the network operator wanting to prevent the myriad of problems that might arise from customers messing around with configurations. Why do you feel the need to have your modem unlocked at this time? What do you expect to gain by it? Are you simply planning to leave the service and want to make sure the modem is unlocked before you go? Are you running out on a contract before termination?
I'm not trying to be difficult, just trying to look at all sides of the issue.
If you can easily prove that you bought the modem "unlocked" then you shouldn't have any concerns. iDirect should assist you in unlocking it. It is an interesting legal question as to whether a network operator can lock up a product that a customer bought and paid for as a means of holding them to their contract. I suppose this could be construed as virtual theft of the modem UNLESS the network operator's contract provided them with this ability and you agreed to it by signing it.
I certainly agree that the network operator should be able to lock the modem in a rental or subsidized equipment situation in which the use of the modem is tied to a contract for service. What does your contract say?
I have a tendency to look at this issue from the network operator's point of view. Many customers have no regard for the contracts they sign. Heck, some customers seem to regard signing of a contract as the start of negotiations, rather than the end of negotiations! The operator must require a large deposit to ensure ongoing payment, or use a tool like locking the customer's hardware to ensure compliance. However I would expect that in either case, the terms and conditions would be spelled out in the contract. If the modem is not provided as part of the service and tied to a specific contract term, then I agree that it seems a bit shady to lock a piece of equipment owned by your client, unless they agree to it first by signing a contract that spells out this requirement.
In any event, this does not become an issue until you switch providers. Should you be planning to do so, and if you are not bound contractually to your current provider, then I would let your new provider know of the situation ahead of time and they should be able to rather quickly get iDirect to unlock the modem if in fact your network operator has no legitimate reason for keeping it locked. After all it will be in the interests of your new provider to make this happen quickly so they can get you up on their service.
It would be interesting to hear some feedback from providers on this whole locking issue, rather than just complaints from customers.
|