|
Mar 3rd, 2009 at 6:10pm
Receive: Assuming no change in the carrier power or modulation towards you then you will improve your downlink rain margin which means less outage time per year due to heavy rain. Assuming no change in carrier power towards you may be able to change the modulation and coding at the far end to reduce your receive satellite costs by perhaps 2/3. Assuming a reduced power carrier towards you this will reduce satellite costs and ease the transmit power requirements needed at the other end.
Transmit: Assuming no change in your uplink power you will be able to buy a cheaper BUC (For example, if you were contemplating a 16W BUC to go with 1.2m dish you would save money by choosing 8W BUC and 1.8m dish) Alternatively, using the same BUC you will be able to double your uplink transmit bit rate.
Regardless of dish size, the mounting needs to be rock steady. Pointing involves 1/6th turn increments of the nuts to peak up. In my experience larger dishes have finer threads on the az/el screws so there is no difference in the sensitivity of the adjustments. The larger dish does require more concrete etc., but I would not let this discourage you.
The off-axis discrimination (on-axis gain versus sidelobe gain) improves with larger dishes and so the interference received from and sent to adjacent satellites reduces. This is particularly important where the satellites are being operated close together. If you want to transmit a high density carrier (i.e. a lot of BUC watts in a narrow bandwidth) the satellite operator will insist on you using a large dish.
Best regards, Eric.
|