Strange iDirect Problem C band on NSS7

(Read 5090 times)

imepals

Member
★★
Offline

Posts: 30

May 4^th, 2011 at 12:28pm

The VSAT dish, a 2.4m offset C-band antenna dish (Patriot) on NSS7 (22WL) dropped off the network 2 months ago after more than a year in operation.

Several attempts to re-align this antenna have been unsuccessful.

I have the following equipment on site:
1. iDirect 3100 modem
2. TXFCC-240CSCN � � �2.4M C-Band �Antenna � � �Patriot
3. NJT5669 � � �5W BUC � � �NJR
4. NJS8476S � � �PLL LNB � � �NJR
5. IFL RG6 cable (30m)

The highest Rx signal strength on iSite is 8.3v. This signal strength fluctuates between 0, 0.3, 2.3 and 8.3v in no particular pattern.

I have done the following in trying to isolate what could cause this problem where i cannot get more than 8.3v on iSite:

1. � � �Swapped the entire feed assembly (BUC, LNB, Feed-OMT/Polarizer/Filter/TXRX) with another feed from a working site. it worked perfectly at the 2nd site but the feed from the second site does gives the same volts on iSite at the faulty site)
2. � � �Loaded the option file from this site with issues to another modem at another site (about 1k apart) and had both a Rx and Tx lock.
3. � � �Used cables from a working site to connect the modem at this faulty site but it didn't get more than 8.3v.
4. � � �Swapped the modem from a working site with the modem of the faulty site. None of the modems got more than 8.3v on iSite but both modem had a Rx and Tx lock at the working site.
5. � � �I have used a spectrum analyser and got a clear channel but cannot get the modem to Rx lock.

The site geo statistics for the VSAT location is N 6.445 and E 3.41151.

I am not really sure at this point why I can�t get more than 8.3v on iSite. Any further data that maybe useful to resolve this will be provided.

Your input will be of great help.

« Last Edit: Aug 18^th, 2011 at 2:29pm by Admin1 »

IP Logged

USN - Retired YaBB Moderator ★★★★★ Offline Posts: 837 Kentucky (USA)	Reply #1 - May 4^th, 2011 at 12:58pm Have you considered local EMI/RFI? When intercepting the same signal - and assuming identical configurations at both sites - how do the C/N ratios compare between the two locations? //greg//
Back to top	USN (Ret) IP Logged

imepals Member ★★ Offline Posts: 30	Reply #2 - May 4^th, 2011 at 3:00pm For the EMI/RFI interference, there would have been an indication from the spectrum analyser. I would not have had a clear chhannel on the spectrum. I don't have a log of the C/N of the faulty site before it went down.
Back to top	IP Logged

USN - Retired

YaBB Moderator
★★★★★
Offline

Posts: 837
Kentucky (USA)

Reply #3 - May 4^th, 2011 at 8:36pm

Quote:

For the EMI/RFI interference, there would have been an indication from the spectrum analyser. I would not have had a clear chhannel on the spectrum.

I don't have a log of the C/N of the faulty site before it went down.

Well that's a shortcoming, but not insurmountable. My point was to compare the level of the noise floor at both sites. If the noise floor is higher at the problem site than at the working site, it's fair to suspect that local EMI/RFI has reduced the C/N at the problem site. It would further explain why swapping in known good equipment failed to remedy the situation.

//greg//

USN (Ret)

IP Logged

imepals Member ★★ Offline Posts: 30	Reply #4 - May 5^th, 2011 at 2:17pm Thanks for your feed back. What would be the remedy if EMI/RFI is suspected?
Back to top	IP Logged

Eric Johnston

Senior Member
★★★
Offline

Posts: 2109

Reply #5 - May 5^th, 2011 at 4:32pm

Diagnose the interference using spectrum analyser. It may help locate the source if you take the feed/LNB off the dish and hold and point the feed all around towards possible sources, such as radio masts, while monitoring the spectrum analyser.

Consider:

Moving the dish down and hiding it from the interference somehow.
see: https://www.satsig.net/satellite/reducing-interference-satellite-tv.htm

If the interference is not at the same frequency as your wanted signal then a filter might suppress the interferer sufficiently for the LNB to work normally. �Filters can be expensive so don't buy till you really understand the problem. �see:
https://www.microwavefilter.com/c-bandfilters.htm
https://www.microwavefilter.com/tvrointerference.htm

Assuming your wanted carrier in the range 3.7-4.2 GHz, some people have had success by using old type LNBs for 3.7 - 4.2 GHz, rather than the more modern wideband LNBs 3.4 - 4.2 GHz. Local WiMAX interference below 3.7 GHz can saturate the LNB. �If you have co-frequency interference then filters won't work. You need to move the dish a long way or go and visit the source and ask them to change frequency.
wxw
Best regards, Eric.

« Last Edit: May 6^th, 2011 at 10:00am by Admin1 »

IP Logged

Pages: 1

Send Topic | Print

Disclaimer, Terms of Use and Privacy Forum User Agreement Forum rules Cookie policy.