Pages: 1

New KA-Sat (Tooway) - abnormally high latency

(Read 8769 times)

mailliw

Member
★★
Offline

Posts: 6

Jul 9^th, 2011 at 6:55pm

Hi,

I bought the new KA-Sat service from Toowaydirect (Avonline) for my mother, who lives in deepest Devon, a couple of weeks ago. The service hasn't lived up to my expectations to say the least, and I could do with a bit of advice.

In short: slow browsing, fast downloads. I know this is typical of satellite connections, and I completely understand that the satellite has to send tonnes of tiny TCP/IP packets from earth to space and back every second. But nevertheless, the level of service seems extremely poor.

For example, there are times when there's no throughput whatsoever. Nothing. Turning the modem off and back on does the trick - I've been visiting for about 24 hours and have cycled the power four times. This surely can't be right.

Connecting a laptop directly to the modem by ethernet doesn't work either. It doesn't want to give out an IP.

The main problem though is simply browsing. It can take 30 seconds or more for a page to load. I just tried hotukdeals.com (stop laughing!) and it sat there, waiting to load, for 35 seconds. Once it had done its DNS lookup, it came through quite quickly, but surely this can't be right?

Couple of traceroutes below. The second hop is always a major problem.

I'm also astonished that there is no way to login to the modem to check for signal status, or *any* diagnostic tools such as s/n ratios or even basic throughput stats.

// inserted by forum admin...
Please try typing 192.168.100.1 into the browser address bar to see modem status //

Can anyone tell me if this is how it's meant to be? I thought the KA-Sat was meant to reduce latency, not average 700ms per request!

Help much appreciated

Will

Traceroute has started�

traceroute to hotukdeals.com (80.64.63.70), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 �hukdlbwb01.hotukdeals.com (80.64.63.70) �1.321 ms �1.151 ms �1.902 ms
2 �* * *
3 �* 10.130.130.9 (10.130.130.9) �2121.109 ms �1227.738 ms
4 �10.130.130.163 (10.130.130.163) �887.069 ms �1277.235 ms �1331.562 ms
5 �88-202-127-98.ip.skylogicnet.com (88.202.127.98 ) �2763.363 ms �1961.073 ms *
6 �10.130.2.17 (10.130.2.17) �713.684 ms �716.678 ms �659.353 ms
7 �10.130.2.42 (10.130.2.42) �774.262 ms �716.158 ms �716.861 ms
8 �10.130.2.50 (10.130.2.50) �718.947 ms �714.264 ms �715.877 ms
9 �10.130.1.22 (10.130.1.22) �818.568 ms �819.023 ms �716.849 ms
10 �ae0-201.fra20.ip4.tinet.net (77.67.90.29) �1199.307 ms �716.523 ms �863.755 ms
11 �* xe-7-1-0.lon25.ip4.tinet.net (89.149.185.193) �1963.161 ms �770.830 ms
12 �* control-circle-gw.ip4.tinet.net (213.200.78.218 ) �1349.120 ms �819.591 ms
13 �80.64.48.70.controlcircle.com (80.64.48.70) �716.363 ms �716.197 ms �716.827 ms
14 �hukdlbwb01.hotukdeals.com (80.64.63.70) �716.760 ms �715.713 ms �716.912 ms

Traceroute has started�

traceroute: Warning: google.com has multiple addresses; using 209.85.148.99
traceroute to google.com (209.85.148.99), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 �fra07s07-in-f99.1e100.net (209.85.148.99) �8.937 ms �0.995 ms �0.893 ms
2 �* * *
3 �10.130.130.9 (10.130.130.9) �781.844 ms �694.204 ms �653.258 ms
4 �10.130.130.163 (10.130.130.163) �677.058 ms �701.541 ms �1038.637 ms
5 �88-202-127-98.ip.skylogicnet.com (88.202.127.98 ) �816.733 ms �714.473 ms �717.199 ms
6 �10.130.2.17 (10.130.2.17) �718.106 ms �738.563 ms �687.542 ms
7 �10.130.1.10 (10.130.1.10) �811.502 ms �714.610 ms �718.070 ms
8 �10.130.2.45 (10.130.2.45) �715.341 ms �702.510 ms �716.832 ms
9 �10.130.1.18 (10.130.1.18 ) �717.305 ms �698.314 ms �736.758 ms
10 �google.franceix.net (193.105.232.2) �698.664 ms �701.673 ms �796.692 ms
11 �72.14.238.228 (72.14.238.228 ) �715.512 ms �974.332 ms �716.967 ms
12 �209.85.248.95 (209.85.248.95) �709.333 ms �716.031 ms �714.409 ms
13 �209.85.254.41 (209.85.254.41) �705.821 ms �692.762 ms
� �209.85.254.57 (209.85.254.57) �680.225 ms
14 �fra07s07-in-f99.1e100.net (209.85.148.99) �712.699 ms �686.663 ms �679.853 ms

Back to top

« Last Edit: Feb 15^th, 2012 at 4:45pm by Admin1 »

IP Logged

Admin1

YaBB Admin
★★★★★
Offline

Posts: 1215

Reply #1 - Jul 9^th, 2011 at 8:06pm

Copy all this to Avonline, saying you are dissatisfied. Tell them everything that may help. They will need to collate it with other customer reports and forward it all to Skylogic Italy and then chase them till it is resolved. It may take some time so you need to be determined and not give up. �Remember it is a learning experience for them, even if they have been practicing with Ku band Tooway. Skylogic can't resolve problems if they don't know about them - so the more problem reports going all the way to them the better. �

You should not need to reboot the modem 4 times a day.

Ask for explanation of the tracert.

The initial step is odd. I've never seen the final destination shown at step 1. The next steps *** look wrong also. �Not sure of the cause but this could be your PC interface configuration. �Are you using the DNS servers recommended by Skylogic ?

I wonder also why the routing starts in 10.x.x.x which is private address space, then goes to skylogic (italy) public address space and then back to private address space (4 hops) - bizarre.

This need sorting out. Please report here when resolved and give the new tracert.

Please would others with Tooway KA-SAT report on their tracert. �Go to start, all programs, accessories, command prompt and type tracert hotukdeals.com in the black command prompt window. In the black window do right click, select all, return, and paste (control v) into this forum.

KA-SAT cannot reduce latency - the latency of satellite links is fixed by the distance divided by the speed of light. �KA-SAT has however significantly reduced the cost of VSAT satellite service for a given bit rate/Mbytes downloaded.

The Tooway Surfbeam modem has in the past been severely deficient with regards to non-display of the download satellite carrier signal quality. All the information exists inside the modem and is regularly sent to the hub where graphical charts are accessible. �Ask Avonline if they can get you this graphical output. e.g:

Best regards, Eric

Back to top

« Last Edit: Jul 9^th, 2011 at 10:35pm by Admin1 »

WWW

IP Logged

mailliw Member ★★ Offline Posts: 6	Reply #2 - Jul 9^th, 2011 at 9:22pm Thanks for the reply, Eric. Valid points. I've mailed Avonline and will let you know the outcome. You're spot on about the private IP range, and the weird "loop" from remote site, back to skylogic and out again. Makes no sense. Do those timings on the traceroute look poor to you? (1000ms, 600ms, etc)
Back to top	IP Logged

Admin1 YaBB Admin ★★★★★ Offline Posts: 1215	Reply #3 - Jul 10^th, 2011 at 9:32am Timings look fairly normal to me. When web browsing via satellite expect an initial two to three seconds delay followed by the web page loading. The time taken for total page load could be in the order of 10 to 20 seconds or more, depending on the complexity of the page such as the number and size of embedded image files etc. Best regards, Eric.
Back to top	« Last Edit: Feb 15^th, 2012 at 4:41pm by Admin1 » WWW IP Logged

fendweller

Member
★★
Offline

Posts: 23
UK

Reply #4 - Jul 14^th, 2011 at 9:27pm

Eric, I think I have some of the problems described but hey, I'm 67 years old and I don't know how to perform a traceroute, let alone make any sense of it when it's done. So I would have trouble taking the matter up with Skylogic. Aren't ordinary dumb chaps supposed to use satellite? It almost seems as if you need a degree to understand it. Is there help for the likes of me?
Regards, Colin

What a whinger! I'm only half as daft as I thought I was . I looked up tracert, used it and got this. Is it bad, if so, how bad?
Tracing route to eu-fp.wa1.b.yahoo.com [87.248.112.181]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

�1 � � * � � � �* � � � �* � � Request timed out.
�2 � � * � � � �* � � � �* � � Request timed out.
�3 �1730 ms � 700 ms � 698 ms �10.130.130.9
�4 � 683 ms � 680 ms � 679 ms �10.130.130.163
�5 � 678 ms � 681 ms � 677 ms �88-202-127-98.ip.skylogicnet.com [88.202.127.98]
�6 � 676 ms � 680 ms � 679 ms �10.130.2.17
�7 � 698 ms � 718 ms � 719 ms �10.130.1.10
�8 � 717 ms � 719 ms � 720 ms �10.130.2.45
�9 �1838 ms � 680 ms � 679 ms �10.130.1.18
10 � 798 ms � 709 ms � 770 ms �195.81.51.225
11 � 687 ms �1114 ms � 709 ms �ae0-0.par-gar-score-1-re0.interoute.net [212.23.42.25]
12 � 708 ms � 719 ms � 719 ms �ae1-0.lon-004-score-1-re0.interoute.net [212.23.42.22]
13 � 718 ms � 720 ms � 719 ms �ge-1-1-0.pat1.the.yahoo.com [195.66.224.129]
14 � 727 ms � 750 ms � 729 ms �so-0-0-0.pat1.irz.yahoo.com [66.196.65.33]
15 � 707 ms � 717 ms � 719 ms �ae-1.msr1.ird.yahoo.com [66.196.67.231]
16 � 737 ms � 710 ms � 719 ms �te-7-4.bas-b2.ird.yahoo.com [87.248.101.105]
17 � 736 ms � 719 ms � 720 ms �ir1.fp.vip.ird.yahoo.com [87.248.112.181]

Trace complete.

Regards....

Back to top

« Last Edit: Jul 15^th, 2011 at 7:23am by Admin1 »

IP Logged

IanH-Powys

Member
★★
Offline

Posts: 16

Reply #5 - Jul 15^th, 2011 at 5:38pm

Best of luck with getting a fast response from Avonline - the problems with our KU band took almost 10 months to resolve ...

try Pingplotter

its a free (onemonth) package that will show path, and latency and plot it on a graph thats very easy to email.

Ian H

2 weeks now on KA band and very happy - though the latency has slightly increased 600ms to 700ms

Back to top

IP Logged

Powys

Member
★★
Offline

Posts: 34

Reply #6 - Jul 17^th, 2011 at 7:06pm

The modem status is available using 192.168.100.1, once your PC or router has connected to it.

I have been using the new system since the start of July, self-installed. �It replaced a system using the old Ka service. also self-installed, and in my opinion it works much better. �It is hardly affected by rain at all. �Link speeds are higher. �Early on I did a 99MB download which averaged 750kBytes/second. �Even without adding in the protocol overheads, that meets the advertised 6Mbps rate.

I have not noticed any increase in latency - and that includes going via a compression proxy somewhere else on the planet. � But I haven't bothered to measure it.

In the last couple of days, the modem did show odd behaviour twice. �Although the link was working fine, as shown on the modem status page, the internet was not there. � At first I thought 'rain in Turin', but there was no rain there. � A power cycle fixed it. �I wonder if there was a firmware update, and this left it in limbo. �It's working perfectly now, and we have some miserable weather at the moment.

I was happy with the old system, and had terrible buyer-regret when I got this one. �I have no regrets now.

Regards, �John

Back to top

IP Logged

Powys Member ★★ Offline Posts: 34	Reply #7 - Jul 17^th, 2011 at 7:21pm Eric, My modem status page gives its IP as a 10.x.x.x address. It seems static. The first hop contains most of the outgoing delay, and Skylogic adds little. Regards, John
Back to top	IP Logged

fendweller

Member
★★
Offline

Posts: 23
UK

Reply #8 - Jul 18^th, 2011 at 11:54am

My website access is slow. This is a section of a trace route again:

Tracing route to eu-fp.wa1.b.yahoo.com [87.248.112.181]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

�1 � � * � � � �* � � � �* � � Request timed out.
�2 � � * � � � �* � � � �* � � Request timed out.
�3 �1730 ms � 700 ms � 698 ms �10.130.130.9
�4 � 683 ms � 680 ms � 679 ms �10.130.130.163
�5 � 678 ms � 681 ms � 677 ms �88-202-127-98.ip.skylogicnet.com [88.202.127.98]

...anyone? I always get the two time-outs at the start whichever site I trace, but I don't know their significance. While the tracert is running they each take about 10 seconds to time-out.
Colin

Back to top

IP Logged

Eric Johnston

YaBB Moderator
★★★★★
Offline

Posts: 2109

Reply #9 - Jul 18^th, 2011 at 5:27pm

I think the two initial lines of timeouts are nothing to worry about. I guess that Skylogic/Viasat have set their equipment so that it does not give out ICMP error messages, which is what tracert needs to make tracert work. It would be nice if they fixed it, simply to make the customers happy, but it won't actually make any difference to the service.

Regarding further down the tracert I wonder why the routing leaves the private address space 10.130.xxx.xxx, goes to the public IP address 88-202-127-98.ip.skylogicnet.com and then back into the private address space 10.130.xxx.xxx before finally leaving into the public internet. I've never seen that before. Strange.

Best regards, Eric.

Back to top

IP Logged

fendweller Member ★★ Offline Posts: 23 UK	Reply #10 - Jul 18^th, 2011 at 6:50pm Thank you Eric. Ummm... you say "strange". I don't know enough to know that it is strange. Is there any further investigation I should do? Colin
Back to top	IP Logged

Eric Johnston

YaBB Moderator
★★★★★
Offline

Posts: 2109

Reply #11 - Jul 18^th, 2011 at 8:06pm

Colin, you say "My website access is slow.".

I would ignore the tracert for the moment and do some tests on speed.

Try some speed testers and tell us what results you get.
My speed tester is https://www.satsig.net/speed-test/speed-tester.htm

How long does it take to download a large pdf document ? Time it and calculate the speed.

It may well be that your download speeds are entirely normal and unremarkable.

If very slow then you may have been throttled due to excessive downloading recently. Ask your service provider for your FAP status.

If you have not been throttled and are still very slow then there must be something the matter. Don't suffer in silence but tell your service provider so that such reports can be put together and maybe solved.
wxw
Best regards, Eric.

Back to top

IP Logged

fendweller

Member
★★
Offline

Posts: 23
UK

Reply #12 - Aug 21^st, 2011 at 7:34pm

Eric, I think that my problems with accessing websites may be to do with Firefox and Google pre-fetches. Is there a known problem with these combined with satellite latency? To this end I was looking for a search-engine without all that rubbish and I came across yours, which seems to work well. However, you don't seem to suggest that there is anything about it that bypasses problems with Google. Nevertheless, I am not getting all the "Server not founds" that had been happening, so I wondered if you'd written something in specifically to avoid hiccups? Regards, Colin

Back to top

IP Logged

Pages: 1

Send Topic | Print